Sunday, September 20, 2020

Proposal for Full Employment and Price Stability through Sustainable Development of Villages - Fully developed villages

The purpose of the proposal is to show the common man, policymakers, Government & other stakeholders that it is possible to achieve full employment and price stability through sustainable development of villages, in a country like India which is resource rich.  And we are providing a model & structure to do that.  

Is it possible to have a workable structure to achieve this? 

India occupies top 3 position in cultivation of many of the farm produces. To sustain and get the maximum benefit out of this, we need to streamline the entire process. This strength is not utilized to get maximum economic benefit to farmers, farm workers and villages. We need an innovative structure to get the best possible outcome. 

Farmers not getting adequate return is a perennial problem in India; produces like tomato thrown to landfill due to excessive supply is a regular occurrence, conveying lack of planning. Middle men and retailers reap the benefits at the cost of farmers

India gets plenty of rain, but storage is very limited. Rural India is home to farming and vast number of unorganised, informal workforce - most of their productive capacity is not utilized. Rural India also is lacking in facilities to produce value added farm products & other essentials which could be produced  with rural workforce participation. Rural population is 980 million, out of which at least 400 million could be part of this productive activity. 

So, rural India has all the necessary real resources to create facilities to produce all the needed basic essentials.  

Water security is an integral part of this process, as only 8% of rainwater is stored in a year (detailed presentation on water security is provided in our Oct 9th (2019) proposal). Chain of water bodies to store rain water have to be built. 

Energy needs can be met by local solar projects to encourage distributed power systems and our traditional gobar gas system could be revived.  

Additionally need to have investment in production facilities for essentials, processing facilities, storage facilities, educational facilities/research facilities/health facilities/sports facilities and supporting infrastructure to promote greatly enhanced real wealth/higher standard of living without adding to emissions.  

Villages have availability of the raw materials, including cultivable land, water which needs to be stored, human resources which needs to be employed and sunlight throughout the year to generate solar power. So, real resources are available to produce value added food products and whatever else could be, given their skills. With improvement in skill, more products and services could be added.

Rural enterprises owned by workers & managed with the assistance of local & district administration would be an ideal model to execute this. 

Is it possible to achieve and sustain full employment? 

India is a vast country with huge population, predominantly living in villages. It is a major strength, as human labour is an important component of productive activities. India's workforce has an extremely high share of informal workers, 85%, and dependents on agriculture & related activities are at least 65%. If they remain informal and unorganised, they will continue to be exploited. Everybody wants to transition to better employment, but the problem is lack of choices in villages. So, they become migrants, live in pitiable conditions in cities, as their work is not valued much wherever they work. With big farmers shifting to mechanisation, small farmers & farm labourers move to Cities & other States for most part of an year to earn some money, leaving their families behind. Moving to cities for employment without much skill and adequate qualification, would only give room for exploitation. It is not a natural progression. Organised and formal sector employment is only 58.9 million. With climate catastrophe more likely than ever and threatening newer pandemics, a sustainable economic model is the need of the hour, rather than a model driven by billion aspirations. So, an ideal solution is getting better employment opportunities in the village itself, as the size of the rural workforce is humongous & there are many issues connected to migration. 

Given the above context, we are talking about achieving formal and organised work for at least 400 million people. First, these 400 million strong workforce cannot be absorbed by the existing formal and organised private sector, as it employs only 59 million formal workers presently. Second, government cannot provide either regular or guaranteed transitional job to all of them, as it is the private sector which provisions the government by supplying goods and services and so it necessarily has to be a large enough sector. Third, ideally it needs to be located at the villages. This is a very unique and challenging context and so a unique solution is warranted.

Our proposal is that Government spends to create infrastructure in all the villages, so that every village will be equipped with roads, water bodies, drinking water facility, school, library, health facility, sports and recreation facilities, solar power and biogas plants, cold storage, warehouse, and skill training facility.

Every village would promote a rural enterprise making the villagers as working partners and engage in production of goods and services for local consumption and sale. This includes vegetable and fruit cultivation, processing and value addition to farm produces. Through training, skills could be imparted and improved to enlarge the number of products and services. 

Government would play facilitatory role, coordinate at reginal level to streamline production of essentials to meet the demand, with active participation of village, taluk and district administration and Agriculture University.

This structure would create a vast producer, consumer community consisting of at least 400 & 980 million people respectively.  

To address the issue of periodical downturn in economy, the existing NREGA, expanded to urban areas with the number of days extended to 300 in stages, could act as the transitional job guarantee program. So, NREGA would be expanding during downturn and shrinking during upturn in economy, so that it supports it as an automatic stabilizer. NREGA wage also has to be increased in stages.  

Nature of work in rural enterprises is production related. NREGA works are related to asset creation & maintenance in water storage & conservation, ground water recharge, soil productivity enhancement, rural housing, livestock promotion infrastructure and other social infrastructure. With the growth of rural enterprises, infrastructure demands in villages will grow. Water storage in series of ponds should be expanded massively to capture most of the rain water.  

As long as loose enough fiscal is maintained, the NREGA pool won't grow all that much as workers transition to private sector employment.  

As the rural enterprise is a producer-consumer group, additionally producing value added essential products for sale, it can structurally sustain itself and profitable. Within a year of operation, it could become self sustaining and start making profit. 

With this model, full employment and price stability could be established.

Conclusion 

The plan clearly shows, real human resources produce and consume real goods and services and in this real economy, the role of nominal money is to make it all work. 

Under the present system of money creation, the fiat non-convertible floating exchange rate currency system, government spending doesn't get funded by tax revenue, as gold reserves doesn't limit currency creation (gold or dollar  reserves is not required to maintain the currency peg (as it is floated) and meet convertibility into gold on demand (as it is non-convertible)). The spending of the currency issuing government in the present currency system is constrained only by the availability of real goods and services to purchase with those spent currency in real economy and regulatorily restricted by the parliamentary approval of Budget and Appropriation Bill. As part of the budgetary process, every spending proposal is analysed from multiple perspectives, including real resource availability, inflationary impact and suitable preventive measures. The government continues to assume that it has only limited capacity to create currency and so is financially constrained to fund production, when productive capacities are available..

Government only needs the political will and is not financially constrained to increase the productive capacity in the country by multiple times and the way to do that is the infrastructure development as suggested above in the villages, which will pave the way for rural enterprises to be promoted by villagers themselves, inclusive growth, universal distribution, full employment and price stability. With this, we could have 600,000 model villages with all the facilities and people earning to lead a peaceful and comfortable life. The multiplier effect of this will lead to further economic development. Efficiency will be achieved with the help of technology, research and skill enhancement, thereby making the productive activities move up in the value chain.

This essential economy requires only planning and willingness, everything else is available! A country of 142 Cr people with assured income and basic facilities would be a land of peace & comfort, one of its kinds in the world!

The above proposal has evolved out of conversation with Warren Mosler & the verbatim extract of the correspondence is given 

https://mmtindia.blogspot.com/2020/09/the-above-program-has-evolved-out-of.html?m=1

Evolution of the Proposal in Conversation with Warren Mosler: A Verbatim Report

The above proposal has evolved out of conversation with Warren Mosler & the verbatim extract of the correspondence is given below: 

Warren Mosler: Thoughts on proposing to make the rural poor employment program universal and with a somewhat higher wage? 

Rajendra Rasu: The employment program for rural poor is called NREGA (National Rural Employment Guarantee Act) program. 

WM: Ok  

Raj: We need to carefully look at the situation. Indian context is unique, compared to developed economies. It has an extremely high share of informal workers, 94%. 

WM: Is the NREGA wage above informal sector wages? 

Raj: NREGA wage has been increasing every year, presently it is at Rs 200 ($3) pet day. It is lower than prescribed minimum wage which is Rs 300 per day. Informal wage varies hugely state to state, based on demand & supply. In Tamilnadu, it is very high Rs 600 per day for men, Rs 400 for women. Other Southern States closer to this. In North, where jobs are few, it is close to NREGA  or minimum prescribed wage, except in Punjab.  

WM: So initially the wage could remain at 200/day to avoid flooding the system and then be increased over time probably to 500 ultimately (inflation adjusted).

As long as loose enough fiscal is maintained the NREGA pool won't grow all that much as workers transition to private sector employment etc.  

Raj: Agreed. Rural population is 980 million, out of which 750 million needs to be uplifted, we can call them poor & lower middle class. Dependence on agriculture & related activities are at least 65%. 

WM: Ok, agriculture probably could have the same output with a lot less employees?  If so, the trick is to transition those who want to transition to other/better employment?  

Raj: Exactly. Everybody want to transition to better employment, but problem is lack of choice in villages. So, they become migrants, live in pitiable conditions in cities as their work is not valued much wherever they work. Also, as big farmers shifted to mechanisation, small farmers & farm labourers move to other States for few months in a year to earn a little, leaving their family behind. Ideal solution is providing better employment in village itself, as the size of rural workforce is humongous & there are many issues connected to migration. 

WM: Exactly 

Raj:  One, is to ensure food & water security in the long run, two, migration makes them live in unliveable condition in cities, three, cities are overcrowded, four, pandemic time all came back to villages, they are reluctant to go back, five, agriculture produces don't get good price, six, middlemen & retail shops gain at the cost of farmers, workers & consumers.  

WM: Increasing agricultural yields via investment and economies of scale can mean more food with fewer employees.  That kind of productivity gain is critical for an improved standard of living.  Too often productivity is conflated with unemployment to the detriment of all.  

Raj: Yes. So, in the above context, if we make NREGA universal, challenges are:

1. Size. Even though it is a demand based guaranteed program, presently only 50 million are employed for 60 days in a year, even though scheme is for 100 days 

WM: A low enough initial wage might keep the initial size down, and wages increased as management is developed?  

Raj: I meant that the size is Himalayan, in billions. 

There is space for creating productive, social and core infrastructure in all parts of the country, particularly in villages, as the existing infrastructure is very limited. If all the 640,000 villages are going to have these infrastructure, then that will provide the impetus for private enterprises getting promoted to meet the needs of the people.

Rural enterprises owned by villagers producing value added food products & essentials could provide employment to most of them. Allied enterprises could be in water storage (only 8% of rainfall is stored & it is predicted to have huge water problem)(my Oct 9th proposal has complete details on bringing water security) & other activities as you listed in the last point. 

WM: Yes, water storage issues need to be addressed immediately.   

Raj: 2. Quality of assets created. Very low. 

WM: Not a problem as the purpose will be to facilitate the transition to private sector employment, which it will do. 

Raj: Food security has to be ensured. Now, farmers get pittance because they sell their produces as such. Value addition is done by middle men. Do that value add in village through villagers owned rural enterprises. We need to see this little differently from typical PV. Profit has to go to workers rather than nonworking private promoters. This will keep the prices also lower. It should have district administration continuous role play, for planned production on macro & micro level to avoid waste & excess, price control, management help, etc. Amul in Gujarat is a world class company, owned by milk farmers (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verghese_Kurien) 

WM: Good points. 

Raj: 3. Only assets are created, no production. 

WM: Not a problem, as above.  The large pool of employed will act as an employment agency for the private sector, allowing fiscal relaxation to increase aggregate demand to attract NREGA workers.  

Raj: Yes. Not only workers, Govt & its arms would get convinced, once it rolls out and provide more support. Once the benefit is seen, program also will evolve. 

So, a very clear district wise planning is required, involving the entire administrative machinery, to build food based enterprises, producing all food products(value-added) including farming, and other essentials. 

WM: I would suggest a move to higher agricultural efficiency- more output with fewer workers- via investment by private sector farmers, and investment in educational facilities/research facilities/health facilities/supporting infrastructure to promote high quality/emission friendly service sector expansion and greatly enhanced real wealth/higher standard of living without adding to emissions, etc. 

Raj: Agreed totally, this could bring in food, water, energy security, meet their health, education & recreational needs. 

Thanks Warren.